Clamxav softpedia7/3/2023 ![]() ![]() (For example, as I noted above, that survey found that Clamxav caught 136 out of 188 pieces of malware, falling in the middle of the pack tested, but three months later its updated definitions would have resulted in its catching 100%.) The survey done a year ago by TheSafeMac ( ) might be of interest, but things move fast in the AV world, so the results are probably out of date. The last time I downloaded something which was designated as Mac malware was probably when I was running OS8, although I have had colleagues who have inadvertently sent me attachments that contained Windows malware. ClamXav has found Windows malware embedded in files that I've downloaded, and therefore been able to make sure I do not pass along to Windows users. * ClamXav only catches ~72% of malware, but author states it was because of issues picking up new signatures which supposedly is fixed now according to the ClamXav forums.Įither way, I'm just trying to prevent myself from forwarding emails/attachments with malware to Windows users. * ClamXav catches ~39% of malware, according to them. I just hope the few reviews out there saying ClamXav doesn't catch most malware aren't 100% true. Sophos is nice, but on my older non-retina MBP it felt sluggish even with a Intel SSD/8GB RAM. I thought about VirusBarrier, but to pay $40/year just to monitor my email/downloads folder is too much especially with my strict, safe, computing practices. That said, since this is my main home computer, I don't really need major AV software. $23 is a not a bad deal especially when you factor in 6-7 years of free usage on my part. You can only scan folders via scheduling or manually, which pushed me to buy the commercial copy. ![]() I tried the App Store version, which runs on Yosemite despite being last updated Aug 2014, but it's missing the Sentry real-time monitoring feature (Apple/MAS limitation?). Very annoying.I just pulled the trigger on the paid version of ClamXav. Which is really a pity, since there's really not that much decent mac security software on the market, most is garbage really. It's so unprofessional, it makes me very skeptical about this "security" software.Īnd it's not the 1st time, I found things like this also informed the developer about things now and then, but I'm afraid it's not going to be of much use (never got any feedback). If you deactivate one of those, of course the software doesn't work correctly anymore. ![]() if I find them after half a year or so? I know my mac quite well, therefore I was able to find out - but the average user can't. ![]() How am I supposed to know, which programs these background activities are belonging to, esp. What's worse, they still look strange / suspicious in the "Background processes" section of the system prefs: there's exactly these 2 entries "Mark Allan" and "open" (the last one even states: "Item from an unidentified developer"). I mean what the heck is "Mark Allan", or "open" supposed to mean, why should I allow this? It's confusing for end users and simply bad GUI design (not optimized in any way for macOS Ventura, and this is after several months of the final release). For example when it installs, it shows strange notifications. I think this is true only for badly programmed AV-software, well programmed AV software should offer these features, leave it to users to deactivate them - and perform good anyhow.īut worse: it's partly rather buggy. I'd say, there's really plenty, not to say too much room for improvement options like behavioral / network protection - of course this wouldn't be for everyone, I know all these mac users who state: it's useless and only slows down my mac. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |